AI and the Trust Trap – Resetting Our Incentives

What if much of today’s AI talent and funding is chasing short-term wins—quick-hit apps, gamified gimmicks, and marginally improved ad targeting—that unintentionally construct a wall of mistrust? It might look harmless on the surface, but the damage runs deeper. These seemingly benign efforts feed a perception that AI is more about manipulation than mission. Each trivial use case, especially those hidden behind black-box models and lacking accountability, slowly erodes public confidence. And that erosion is cumulative. If left unchecked, it could lead to a societal backlash that blocks AI from addressing the more serious problems it is uniquely positioned to solve.

Consider what we’re risking. AI could stabilize power grids by forecasting demand spikes and rerouting energy in real-time. It could personalize diagnostics in healthcare, optimize supply chains for medicine, and model complex systems to accelerate drug development. In defense, it could strengthen cyber resilience, support logistics under pressure, or assist with mission-critical decision support. Infrastructure, too, could become self-monitoring—bridges that warn before failing, rail systems that adapt to disruptions, water systems that predict shortages.

But each of these depends on public trust. And right now, most people interact with AI through experiences that feel extractive or obscure. Loan denials with no explanation. Recommendation engines that reinforce bias or polarize discourse. Systems that profile behavior and nudge decisions without consent. These experiences aren’t just bad PR; they build a trust deficit. And the longer we let that gap widen, the harder it will be to gain approval for deploying AI in the areas that really matter.

Why are we here? The incentives are simply misaligned. The prevailing system rewards immediacy: ship fast, scale fast, monetize now. In that world, incentives point toward attention extraction, not social impact. The result is a version of AI optimized for engagement metrics, not enduring value. This is not a failure of capability—it’s a failure of economic direction.

So who should intervene to realign those incentives? Governments can help by directing procurement toward projects that deliver measurable social good, and by enforcing rules that demand explainability, fairness, and transparency. Public R&D funding should come with requirements for openness—both in methods and in outcomes. Policy should also recognize that AI, like any infrastructure, creates lock-in. Once we build opaque systems, they become hard to reverse.

Investors also have a role to play. There is room—and arguably necessity—for new funding theses: ones that value long-term resilience over near-term exploitation, that seek companies optimizing for trust, not just margin. Boards and LPs should ask different questions. What impact will this model have on civic trust? Can this system be audited? Would a regulator, a citizen, or a competitor be able to inspect and understand its behavior?

And there’s a role for all of us. As users, voters, professionals, and citizens, we should demand AI systems that work for us, not just on us. Trust isn’t automatic—it’s earned. That means explaining how decisions are made, inviting scrutiny, and building systems that remain accountable even under pressure.

We don’t lack for AI breakthroughs. What we lack is alignment: between the capabilities we build and the incentives that shape their use. We can continue rewarding trivial applications that deepen mistrust, or we can consciously reset the system to promote transparency, accountability, and value that lasts. AI’s potential is not hypothetical—but realizing it depends on whether we choose to steer it where it matters most.

Project Overwatch is a cutting-edge newsletter at the intersection of cybersecurity, AI, technology, and resilience, designed to navigate the complexities of our rapidly evolving digital landscape. It delivers insightful analysis and actionable intelligence, empowering you to stay ahead in a world where staying informed is not just an option, but a necessity.